[Full-Disclosure] Counseling not to use Windows (was Re: Anonymous surfing my ass\!)

[David F. Skoll]

On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Roland Postle wrote:

> I should mention that I'm only referring to Windows NT here, Windows 9x /is/
> one monumental design flaw and not even worth talking about.

> It's hardly a 'fundamental design flaw' if it can be configured differently.

Well, OK.  But let's say you tighten up security on NT.  Then you
discover that all kinds of third-party (and Microsoft, for that
matter) software doesn't work any more.

> Many default unix installations will leave all a user's newly created files
> with world read access.

That's true.  World-read access is slightly less of a problem than
world-execute access.  And some Linux distros (e.g. Mandrake) offer
"security levels" which (among other things) let you change the default
umask to 077.

> And I bet the vast majority of novice computer users
> (the ones most at risk) would find it easier to change their file
> permissions on a Windows machine than a unix machine.

Well, the vast majority of novice computer users aren't using UNIX
(unless you count Mac OS X).

> The fact that 99% of Windows users are clueless is no reflection on Windows'
> actual security.

But Microsoft touts "ease of use" which lulls people into believing that
you don't need as much skill to use or secure Windows as UNIX.  And that's
irresponsible.

--
David.