[Full-Disclosure] My Signature
Keith A. Pachulski
keithp at corp.ptd.net
Wed May 12 20:29:59 BST 2004
and this has what to do with anything of importance or to the relevance
of this mailing list?
On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 09:56, Nico Golde wrote:
> some of the people told me that my signature isn't correct.
> for some people here it looks like this or simelarly:
> Nico Golde | nico at ngolde.de | 310777820 at ICQ | nion at gmx.=
> http://www.ngolde.de | GnuPG Key: http://www.ngolde.de/gpg/nico_golde.=
> Fingerprint | FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7=
> vim -c ":%s/^/WhfgTNabgureRIvzSUnpxreT-Tavba/|:%s/[R-T]/ /Ig|:normal
> i dont know why it is so, because for me and some others it looks like
> Nico Golde | nico at ngolde.de | 310777820 at ICQ | nion at gmx.net
> http://www.ngolde.de | GnuPG Key: http://www.ngolde.de/gpg/nico_golde.gpg
> Fingerprint | FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF
> vim -c ":%s/^/WhfgTNabgureRIvzSUnpxreT-Tavba/|:%s/[R-T]/ /Ig|:normal ggVGg?"
> my mailer is mutt(linux) and i have really no idea why some people here say it is so.
> in the attachment is my signature file, if someone will take a look.
> but i think it only depends on the mailer you use or the formation.
> does someone have an idea?
> regards nico
|Keith A. Pachulski | PenTeleData LP1 Information Security and Privacy|
|Phone: (800) 281.3564 x2454 | Pager: 6103497095 at vtext.com|
|PGP: 6B56 C8DC 6201 6D1A BFF5 5799 E193 ABAA 9549 74D0|
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040512/7deccf73/attachment.bin
Full-Disclosure is hosted and sponsored by Secunia.