[Full-Disclosure] Multiple AV Vendors ignoringtar.gz archives (fwd)

[Barrie Dempster]

On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 10:16 -0500, Paul Laudanski wrote:
> Folks, here is a summary of a discussion with Mark at Eset for NOD32 about 
> .tar.bz2.  So what do you folks think, how many people would like to see 
> this capability?
> 

I don't think it is something customers will request until/if viruses
start using it. The original point was that it was something viruses
might take advantage of, however it's good to see a vendor seriously
listening to it's customers. kudos to NOD32.

-- 
With Regards..
Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue

blog: http://zeedo.blogspot.com
site: http://www.bsrf.org.uk

[ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver www.keyserver.net 0x96025FD0 ]


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050208/21d4ba03/attachment.bin