[Full-disclosure] alert: the 111111 bug

[mbs]

I saw the same thing happen on 9/9/99

The company went through a flurry of data entry, and they seemed to ride 
out the event well enough.

This may have been due to a few pointed warnings from the technical 
staff. Then again, it may have been wrapped in with the changes for the 
2000 'bug', so they may have had a budget for it.



lsi wrote:

>platforms affected: all
>distribution of threat: wide
>severity of threat: potentially serious
>leadtime: 6.3 years :)
>
>I noticed one of my customers using the "special" date of 11/11/11 in 
>their database.  
>  
>