[Full-disclosure] NEW USA FFIES Guidance

[Lyal Collins]

Like running to a bank/post office and getting a certificate?
Certs are just a password verification tool, where user password
verification occurs locally intead of at the server.  This is NOT two-factor
byt any definition, just a password verificaiton displacement tool.
 
At a very quick look at the documentation, Australian banks have had similar
guidelines for some months.  
The key requirement seems to be "do a risk assessment, and act based on the
outcome".  Everything else is optional, based on the risk assessment,
however that is performed, and whatever that internal document recommends.  
On this model, its easy to justify not doing anything, since the fraud
dollar losses don't seems to be even a few percent of the costs to implement
and support two factor hardware devices based on the anecdotal evidence and
reviews I''ve seen.
 
Lyal
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces at lists.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces at lists.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Casey
DeBerry
Sent: Thursday, 13 October 2005 7:30 AM
To: full-disclosure at lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] NEW USA FFIES Guidance


For those that fall under US FFIEC governance, what are you doing to satisfy
these requirements?  I'd like to think I have more options than running to
the store to pick up my RSA keyfobs...  What about PKI?  Are there other
options for web based apps?
 
http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2005/fil10305.html
 
C. DeBerry

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20051013/14121fe8/attachment.html