[Full-disclosure] More information on ZERT patch for ANI 0day

[James (njan) Eaton-Lee]

Gadi,

Gadi Evron wrote:

> For a real current attack.

Understandably. This is the attack which this thread is about, as 
indicated in the subject line of the e-mail.

To recap, you used the phrase "flawed copy routine." to refer to the 
fact that you could carry out an attack using this particular attack 
method by writing to "typically C:\WINDOWS\ or C:\WINNT\". Again, to 
recap, my point was:

"an attacker with write access to %systemroot%
  probably has juicier, simpler targets to attack (which potentially let 
them run code in a higher security context) than animated cursors."

Do you have any reply to make to what I actually *said*?

  - James.

-- 
   James (njan) Eaton-Lee | UIN: 10807960 | http://www.jeremiad.org

    "All at sea again / And now my hurricanes
    Have brought down this ocean rain / To bathe me again"

  https://www.bsrf.org.uk | ca: https://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=3
-- 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3521 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20070402/3542d953/attachment.bin