[Full-disclosure] Google's blacklisted url database (phishing url database)

[Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu]

On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:58:55 +0100, Steve Clement said:
> As to whether the Blacklist should be public or not is up to personal 
> believes. I for one think that it should be publicly available to have 
> at least a good static reference of the most commonly used phishey sites...

There's no such thing as "most commonly used" - these things are ephemeral
and very much in the whack-a-mole variety.  Last week's list is of almost
no help in telling you where this week's sites are, except when looked at
long-term trends you start to notice that some providers are lax on security
and as a result keep getting pwned.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20070103/14442b49/attachment.bin