[Full-disclosure] More proof that Microsoft products are probably backdoored
xploitable at gmail.com
Wed Dec 3 08:34:56 GMT 2008
You're like a shite that won't flush away.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Ureleet <ureleet at gmail.com> wrote:
> all speculation:
> no 1 knows 4 sure.
> c how i did that n3td3v? i posted links, nd talked about the article
> w/out stealing ppls work.
> pay attention.
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andy McKnight <andy.mcknight at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2008/12/2 Ureleet <ureleet at gmail.com>
>>> u arent getting it.
>>> it has nothing 2 do w/ backdoors. they r talking about actual
>>> backdoors in the code. so that anyone who knows the backdoor can
>>> acess any windows system regarless. they r saying that microsoft has
>>> coded backdoors into the system so that the govt can get into any
>>> system, patched or not. pay attention.
>> I haven't seen anything that suggests that systems are/will be backdoored
>> here. The text of the statement said "remote searches" which in legal terms
>> could be anything from something as simple as browsing shared files
>> available through P2P to full remote system access.
>> Do you have anything else that suggests Windows has backdoors present other
>> than this statement?
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Full-Disclosure is hosted and sponsored by Secunia.