[Full-disclosure] Why FD should unban n3td3v.
lanec42 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 31 05:07:15 BST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At: Sun Aug 30 23:05:55 CDT 2009
I agree completely. n3td3v et. al. annoy me, but I like freedom of speech. ;)
“Censorship reflects a society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a
hallmark of an authoritarian regime.” --Potter Stewart
)) ___ _ _ __
((__ ((_( ((\( (('
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 8:56 PM, John Q Publix<johnqpublicr at hush.com> wrote:
> Some of you may call n3td3v annoying, others may call him funny,
> but others may genuinely value his comments on the list.
> Leave it up to the reader to decide.
> FD exists to be unmoderated and uncensored. This list is a great
> thing, and I'm requesting that it be restored to it's former glory.
> While I'm no fan of n3td3v, censoring him sets a dangerous
> precedent. If I wanted to filter out his mails client-side, I still
> could btw.
> Just don't censor him on the server.
> Just my 2 cents.
> john q public
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Full-Disclosure is hosted and sponsored by Secunia.