<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Paul Schmehl wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid446B6AD8.2010302@utdallas.edu" type="cite">Pete
Simpson wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">You have confirmed that the data are correct,
you have no way to attack
<br>
the principles, so where is the logical error? Be very precise.
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
Pete, are you even reading what I wrote? A building the size of the
twin towers would fall to the ground in under 10 seconds, per the
standard calculations that, as you say, any high school student would
know.
<br>
<br>
How much more precise do I need to be? Your calculations are incorrect
by an order of ten. Instead of 90+ seconds, the answer is 9.0+ - IOW,
precisely the same amount of time it took for the buildings to actually
fall.
<br>
<br>
Furthermore, you have a logical fallacy in your argument, because you
are insisting that a controlled demolition collapse would be faster
than an accidental collapse. Which part of the equation tells you
that? Objects faill at 32 feet per second per second. The *cause* of
the fall is irrelevant.
<br>
<br>
Now, you're obviously wedded to this believe of yours that the
government conspired to collapse the buildings. Why is irrelevant.
But until you can deal with the facts staring you in the face, there
isn't much point in continuing this discussion.
<br>
<br>
BTW, there's no need to cc me on your posts. I can read the list just
fine.
<br>
<br>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html">http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html</a>
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://secunia.com/">http://secunia.com/</a></pre>
</blockquote>
This is really material for a poli group. The interesting thing is that
we indeed seem to have elected a government that<br>
many of us don't trust and think is up to no good. I am sorry but this
is unsually high. I have haeard too many curious<br>
things from too many people who one I would have never heard such
things from in the past. Of course there is an election<br>
comeing and we can throw some of 'em out of office. Of course some of
this sounds like a Sally Churkshank(sp?) Short like<br>
the her "Charbucks" presentation. which lives here:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.funonmars.com/charflash.html">http://www.funonmars.com/charflash.html</a><br>
<br>
But everytime I hear these things thing comes to mind and it is like
one is living in a Sally C production Still really I dunno whther<br>
this would be better talked out on a poligroup. But the amount of
emotion devoted to all of this is interesting. One would not expect<br>
one's freind's child's 4th grade teachers to be into these sorts of
things.<br>
<br>
Have Fun,<br>
Sends Steve<br>
</body>
</html>