On 10/12/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Paul Schmehl</b> <<a href="mailto:pauls@utdallas.edu">pauls@utdallas.edu</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
--On October 12, 2006 11:22:36 PM -0400 "Scott T. Cameron"<br><<a href="mailto:scameron@routehero.com">scameron@routehero.com</a>> wrote:<br><br>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:19:20PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
<br>>> BTW, you completely misunderstand Godwin's Law.<br>>> <<a href="http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/legends/godwin/">http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/legends/godwin/</a>><br>><br>> "There is a tradition in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion
<br>> forums that once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and<br>> whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically "lost" whatever debate was<br>> in progress. This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin's
<br>> Law. Thus Godwin's Law serves also to impose an upper bound on thread<br>> length in general."<br>><br>> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
</a><br><br>Look up "comparison" in a dictionary. Then come back here and explain<br>that in the context of what I wrote. I didn't *compare* anything or<br>anyone to Hitler. I referred to Hitler, the historical figure himself.
<br>You really do not understand Godwin's law at all.<br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>Are you guys familiar with the term 'stfuncyfd' ?<br><br>I'll enlighten you: 'shut the fuck up nobody cares, you fucking douchebags'<br>