----------------- To Thierry:<br><br>> Oh, dear, here is my "thinly veiled advert" for you :<br><br>> - You can potentially be sued for this (I would sue you, <br>> see you are slandering a consultant here that gets jobs based
<br>> on his reputation)<br><br>First of all I haven't said anything that could not be rebated.<br>So I am not slandering anyone. I just said what I'm thinking at the moment; <br>maybe Max Moser can make me change my mind.
<br><br>> you refer to ? I have read the paper and found none, where did you ?<br><br>The software is described into detail inside the paper.<br>Dongle activation, .ini files and .dcu files. This seems to run on<br>Windows. I know only one software like this one (Maybe you are using it as well).
<br><br>> Where is he promoting Software Piracy ? I have read the paper and found none, where did you ?<br><br>Those software are based upon a dongle (USB Bluetooth in this case). <br>If you can clone the dongle, you could be able to easily clone the software.
<br><br>> First, I knew nothing about such a "release" until YOU posted information about the name<br>> of a (what apparently is) a Warez group<br><br>I'm sorry this was my mistake, but there wasn't any direct link to the release.
<br>Anyway I found this stuff after I have read the .pdf document. At first I have found the vendor<br>then I have searched in google "Vendor + CSR dongle" and I found that.<br><br>> Second, you apparently assume the Warez group is the same person that wrote the paper, which is
<br>> a very ignorant assumption to make, not to mention a dangerous one.<br><br>I never told this.<br><br>> The opensource community I think that is able to do it's own research without software piracy. <br><br>
Read it as not forcing (or partially forcing) the protection of commercial software.<br><br><br>----------------- To Anders:<br><br>I agree with you