Hi Kevin, <br><br>I could understand that vendors are charging simple CSR dongles (19 dollars??) up to thousands of dollars.<br>But the way to publish a paper making a direct reference (if someone is aware about the underlying piece of software he is talking about) to a particular vendor it's not so cute. Maybe they have written their firmware.
<br><br>Worse is to sustain the fact that the world need a better bluetooth sniffer, using the information that can be found inside the warezed version of the tool. The opensource community I think that is able to do it's own research without software piracy.
<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/4/1, Kevin Finisterre (lists) <<a href="mailto:kf_lists@digitalmunition.com">kf_lists@digitalmunition.com</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Giorgio if anything he is blowing the whistle on the vendors that<br>charge a metric shit ton for a piece of hardware that is not necessary.<br>-KF<br></blockquote></div><br>