<span class="q"><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/9/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Stack Smasher</b> <<a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:stacksmasher@gmail.com" target="_blank">stacksmasher@gmail.com
</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><br>If anyone out there was doubting <font size="-1">Dan Kaminsky at Blackhat/DefCon this year, it has already started.
</font><br><br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN091821320070809?feedType=RSS&rpc=22&sp=true" target="_blank">http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN091821320070809?feedType=RSS&rpc=22&sp=true
</a></blockquote>
<div> </div></span>
<div>This isn't really ISP censorship. AT&T is an ISP, but in this case, they were acting as a broadcaster.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Whether or not you agree with what AT&T did, the fact is that, as a broadcaster/publisher of a concert, they have every right to edit it as they see fit. Was it a stupid thing to do? Yes, if just because it's a horrible PR move. Was it *ISP* censorship? No, because they weren't editing a third-party site so their subscribers get different content than the rest of the world.
</div>