Who really cares what the definition of 0-day is to you or that you think everyone uses it wrong? In the grand scheme of things you're like the rest of us, you don't really matter.<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">
On 9/25/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Gadi Evron</b> <<a href="mailto:ge@linuxbox.org">ge@linuxbox.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:<br>> For the record, the original term "O-Day" was coined by a dyslexic<br>> security engineer who listened to too much Harry Belafonte while working<br>> all night on a drink of rum. It's true. Really.
<br>><br>> t<br><br>Okay. I think we exhausted the different views, and maybe we are now able<br>to come to a conlusion on what we WANT 0day to mean.<br><br>What do you, as professional, believe 0day should mean, regardless of
<br>previous definitions?<br><br>Obviously, the term has become charged in the past couple of years with<br>the targeted office vulnerabilities attacks, WMF, ANI, etc.<br><br>We require a term to address these, just as much as we do "unpatched
<br>vulnerability" or "fully disclosed vulnerability".<br><br>What other such descriptions should we consider before proceeding?<br>non-disclosure?<br><br> Gadi.<br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.<br>Charter: <a href="http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html">http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html</a><br>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - <a href="http://secunia.com/">
http://secunia.com/</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>-- h0 h0 h0 --<br><a href="http://www.nopsled.net">www.nopsled.net</a>