<div>Why to believe on Antivirus !!! check it out urself ......No malicious activity</div>
<div>no bot, no keylogger, plain code to .....:)</div>
<div>Then what is the meaning of BACKDOORED??<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/27/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">zwell.nosec</b> <<a href="mailto:zwell.nosec@gmail.com">zwell.nosec@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Oh, Really?<br>So you can compress using UPX again, then upload to virustotal.<br>Check it out, ;)<br>Thanks<br>
<br>-----邮件原件-----<br>发件人: Razi Shaban [mailto:<a href="mailto:razishaban@gmail.com">razishaban@gmail.com</a>]<br>发送时间: 2008年3月27日 14:54<br>收件人: zwell.nosec<br>抄送: <a href="mailto:full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk">full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk</a>; <a href="mailto:websecurity@webappsec.org">websecurity@webappsec.org</a><br>
主题: Re: 答复: [Full-disclosure] The reason why "Pangolin is backdoor"<br><br>I have enough experience with UPX to know that it's a fairly good packer.<br>If you placed the backdoor into the code yourself, I'm not surprised<br>
that the packed version is UD by most virus-scanner.<br><br>Doesn't make it any less of a backdoor.<br><br>--<br>Razi<br><br><br><br>On 3/27/08, zwell.nosec <<a href="mailto:zwell.nosec@gmail.com">zwell.nosec@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Just do it yourself pls, using the "backdoored" pangolin.exe you think and<br>> decompress it, then upload to virustotal, I did not change any bits ;)<br>><br>> -----邮件原件-----<br>> 发件人: Razi Shaban [mailto:<a href="mailto:razishaban@gmail.com">razishaban@gmail.com</a>]<br>
> 发送时间: 2008年3月27日 14:32<br>> 收件人: zwell.nosec<br>> 抄送: <a href="mailto:full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk">full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk</a>; <a href="mailto:websecurity@webappsec.org">websecurity@webappsec.org</a><br>
> 主题: Re: [Full-disclosure] The reason why "Pangolin is backdoor"<br>><br>><br>> Wow! Cryptors prevent viruses from being detected?<br>><br>> Who would have thought!<br>><br>><br>> --<br>
> Razi<br>><br>><br>> On 3/27/08, zwell.nosec <<a href="mailto:zwell.nosec@gmail.com">zwell.nosec@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> > Pangolin really is a backdoor? Let's do this step to make sure:<br>
> > 1.Download UPX from <a href="http://upx.sf.net">upx.sf.net</a><br>> > 2.In cmd shell, run "upx.exe -d pangolin.exe"<br>> > 3.Upload the new pangolin.exe(actually the origin) to virustotal<br>
> > 4.Check the result again<br>> > I do these, and the result is:<br>> > <a href="http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/b9d55c751d5eed7b34cda3fe708b1bd7">http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/b9d55c751d5eed7b34cda3fe708b1bd7</a><br>
> ><br>> > We can see<br>> ><br>><br>Kaspersky,Sophos,F-Secure,CAT-QuickHeal,F-Prot,Ikarus,AntiVir,Prevx1,TheHack<br>> > er,Webwasher-Gateway will not alert any more.<br>> ><br>> > You judge what is it! Or maybe we should think about what does these<br>
> > Antivirus do???<br>> ><br>> > Thanks ;)<br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.<br>> > Charter: <a href="http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html">http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html</a><br>
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - <a href="http://secunia.com/">http://secunia.com/</a><br>> ><br>><br>><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.<br>
Charter: <a href="http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html">http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html</a><br>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - <a href="http://secunia.com/">http://secunia.com/</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>