notdev,<br><br>Clearly you missed the entire point of my reply. I was hoping that I could appeal to some level _thought_ that you might see this as a serious question, and not a springboard for a useless rant. I was mistaken to think that you would engage in a meaningful dialog that would benefit others who may have the same questions that I do.<br>
<br>So what you are implying is that Kenneth Geers, et al, are hoaxers.<br><br>You, sir, are an idiot.<br><br>Cheers and all the best !<br><br>G. Stackseg <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:49 AM, andrew. wallace <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andrew.wallace@rocketmail.com">andrew.wallace@rocketmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Gomer Stackseg<br>
<<a href="mailto:faultintolerant@gmail.com">faultintolerant@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> G'day,<br>
><br>
> Does there exist a "standard definition" of cyber warfare that is used as a<br>
> reference to calculate risk / security requirements?<br>
><br>
> Based on this definition, do we know that the statement you make here is<br>
> true?<br>
><br>
> Cheers !<br>
><br>
> G. Stackseg<br>
<br>
</div>Estonia wasn't a Cyber War<br>
<br>
Georgia wasn't a Cyber War<br>
<br>
Gaza isn't a Cyber War<br>
<br>
*There has been no Cyber War*<br>
</blockquote></div><br>