Heh, now that would be interesting. I wonder if the "intent" scenario would apply to this also?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:56 PM, decoder <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:decoder@own-hero.net">decoder@own-hero.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
I can't answer the question but it would be even more interesting to
answer this if you're using a One-Time-Pad (i.e. two files of equal
size on two different servers, both XORed give you the data). There
exists a mathematical proof that none of the two files leak a single
bit of information of the original data :)<br>
<br>
<br>
Chris<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 02/18/2011 07:50 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] wrote:
</div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<div>Sorry, when I say eligible, I mean "which server would they
be allowed to take down by law?".
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I'm not too hot on the laws of encryption, but I'm sure
there is something which states that hosting encrypted files
are not illegal, it's distributing the key which allows you to
gain access to those fails, which is actually illegal.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>*DISCLAIMER: I don't know if the above is true or not, so
apologies if I got this wrong*
<div>
<div><br>
<div><br>
<div>On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:46 PM, ck <span><<a href="mailto:c.kernstock@googlemail.com" target="_blank">c.kernstock@googlemail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote>I go with the server hosting the files
since the key should be<br>
significant smaller than the files and therefor much
easier to mirror.<br>
<div>
<div><br>
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Cal Leeming
[Simplicity Media Ltd]<br>
<<a href="mailto:cal.leeming@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk" target="_blank">cal.leeming@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk</a>>
wrote:<br>
> So here's a thought.<br>
> If illegally distributed files (such as
this one) were encrypted and hosted<br>
> on one server, and the key hosted on
another, which server would<br>
> be eligible for take down?<br>
><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</div></div><pre><fieldset></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: <a href="http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html" target="_blank">http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html</a><div class="im">
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - <a href="http://secunia.com/" target="_blank">http://secunia.com/</a></div></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.<br>
Charter: <a href="http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html" target="_blank">http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html</a><br>
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - <a href="http://secunia.com/" target="_blank">http://secunia.com/</a><br></blockquote></div><br>